Why “Code” is a Bad Word for Home Inspectors

In the world of home inspections, the word “code” is often met with caution. While the term might seem straightforward, its use by a home inspector can lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and even legal complications.

This article looks at why “code” can be a problematic word for home inspectors—and why it’s important to use alternative language when discussing findings with clients.

We all understand our role as home inspectors and how home inspectors play a crucial role in assessing the condition of a property. We provide clients with detailed information about the home’s current state, identifying potential issues that may require attention. However, it is important to note that home inspections are not designed to be compliance checks with building codes.

What Does “Code” Mean?

When people refer to code, they are typically talking about building codes or standards established by local, state, or county authorities to ensure the safety and habitability of structures. These codes cover everything from electrical systems and plumbing to structural integrity, accessibility, general maintenance, and fire safety. Typically, a building code is a law that sets minimum acceptance and/or requirements for building system and structure on how to be designed or constructed. Let’s stress minimum acceptance.

Why is it difficult for home inspectors not to say the “code” word? Well, we study and strive to have an understanding of the minimum standards and identify defects, but we need to be careful not to appear to be the jurisdiction of authority. Here are a few examples.

The Problem with Using the Word “Code”

1. Misleading Clients

When home inspectors use the word code, clients may mistakenly believe that the inspection is a thorough evaluation of the property’s compliance with current building codes. This misunderstanding can lead to false assumptions about the inspector’s role and the scope of the inspection.

2. Legal Implications

Home inspectors are not code enforcement officers. If an inspector cites code violations, they may inadvertently imply that they are qualified to enforce those standards. This can result in legal liability if a client acts on the inspector’s statements, expecting them to be definitive evaluations of code compliance.

3. Changing Standards

Building codes are constantly updated and vary by location. What may have been compliant at the time a home was built may not meet current standards. Inspectors might unintentionally compare a home’s condition to modern codes, leading to inaccurate assessments of older properties.

Our focus should be on safety, not compliance. Home inspections prioritize identifying safety hazards, functional issues, and maintenance concerns. While some of these issues may relate to building codes, inspectors focus on practical implications rather than strict compliance. Using the term code can shift the emphasis away from practical safety considerations.
Home inspectors should use alternative language to avoid the pitfalls associated with the word code when communicating with clients. Here are some suggestions:

1. Describe the Condition

Instead of referencing code, describe the condition
of the component or system. For example, instead
of saying, “This electrical panel is not up to code,”
you might say, “This electrical panel is outdated and may pose a safety risk.”

2. Highlight Safety Concerns

Emphasize any safety concerns you observe during the inspection. For instance, “The lack of a handrail on the stairs presents a safety hazard,” clearly communicates the issue without invoking code. My suggestion is to guide your client to a qualified professional who can repair, upgrade, or fix the issue.
“I highly recommend contacting
a qualified carpenter professional
for evaluation and repair.”

3. Suggest Improvements

Offer recommendations for improvement without suggesting that they are necessary to meet code. For example, “Upgrading the plumbing fixtures could improve efficiency and reduce the risk of leaks.”

Be sure to clarify your role as the home inspector. Ensure clients understand the scope of a home inspection by explaining your role. Let them know that while you identify potential issues, you are not conducting a code compliance check.
I suggest reviewing your agreement to ensure it does not imply any such reference to the code. If a client mentions code on the phone or during the inspection, always reiterate to them that this is not a code inspection. Remind your client about your limitations so their expectations are clear.
In conclusion, as I tell my students when teaching, code is just another four-letter word that should not be used on the inspection. The word code can be a misleading and potentially harmful term in the context of home inspections.

By focusing on safety, condition, and practical recommendations, home inspectors can provide valuable insights to clients without the complications associated with code compliance. Clear communication and understanding of the inspector’s role are key to avoiding misunderstandings and ensuring clients receive the information they need to make informed decisions about their properties.

Opinions or statements of authors are solely their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions or positions of ASHI, its agents, or editors. Always check with your local governmental agency and independently verify for accuracy, completeness, and reliability.